A rainbow book shelf. A pile-up of design icons. Everything beige. These are the most egregious home decor violations, according to "Instagram's most annoying design critic."

As Instagram’s most annoying design critic, I’ve been asked by CULTURED to compile a list of some of the egregious things you are doing wrong in your home (although if you’re already reading CULTURED, you’ve seen enough Instagram design reels to know the no-nos). And look, we all know taste is subjective and our preferences are downstream of privilege and conditioned by the cultural hegemony formed by the changing whims of the elite, but the following are just objectively awful.

Some things go beyond dialectical materialism and are simply rules of nature. The biggest takeaway you can get from this is that I want you to make decisions, ones that feel personal and true to you, and not have you cower in fear of doing something wrong. So, let’s get started.

Sunlit open-plan living room with an Eames lounge chair, a Noguchi coffee table, and French doors opening to a garden.
An Eames lounge chair is paired with a Noguchi table in this open-plan living room. Image courtesy of Dwell.

Offense: Too Many Design Icons

Why It’s Wrong: There is such a thing as too much good taste, and that’s when every “thing” in your home is a thing. A Noguchi lamp, an Eames lounge, a Bellini Sofa, a Perriand Nuage Unit, a Barcelona coffee table… each one of these on their own are iconic, impeccable pieces of course, but grouped all together it just feels like you live in a Design Within Reach showroom. This just shows you’ve done the homework, but your home doesn’t really have a soul or a perspective. It isn’t you in any meaningful way, because you haven’t made any decisions, it’s Ctrl-C Ctrl-V good taste, and you’ve just swallowed the design establishment consensus whole-hog.Do this Instead: Start by limiting yourself to one icon per room, and allow yourself to branch out and develop your own taste. Go deeper than just the hits of 20th-century design, go foraging in an estate sale, check out eBay in Europe, freak out on some ’70s Italian experimental lighting, and actually find pieces that you yourself find exciting. Maybe you’ll pick something ugly and weird, something that an AD100 designer would never pick, that totally “clashes” with your armoire, but goddamnit at least it will be you.

Neutral-toned living room with a beige sofa and wooden side table.
Photography by Aleksandra Dementeva/Unsplash.

Offense: All Beige Everything

Why It’s Wrong: What’s so exhilarating about designing your home is that, even if you have the personality of a floss pick, you’re able to create who you wish you could be through your design choices. It’s play, it’s theater, your home’s a stage. And so given all the choices in the world, the blank canvas on which you’re able to paint the story of your life, you decide to paint the canvas… white? Look, I get it, you want your home to be your sanctuary, your temple, the place you can find refuge in this crazy world. But then you quickly turn around and find yourself living in a med spa, waiting for the nurse to roll out an IV drip. An oatmeal sectional, an ivory tufted ottoman, a taupe chair… this is where they euthanize dementia patients. You owe yourself and your guests more than that.Do this Instead: I’m not saying you have to go full Pee-Wee’s Playhouse, but think about what tones and hues you gravitate to and how incorporating them into your home can enliven your atmosphere. And if you don’t want to go crazy with color, consider mixing in different textures, metals, lacquers, etc. to give some range to the monochrome lifestyle you have chosen to adopt.

Red neon “Peace Love” sign on a white paneled wall behind palm and houseplant leaves.
Photography by Jacalyn Beales/Unsplash.

Offense: Words in the Home

Why It’s Wrong: We get it: you want your guests to know you’re “Classy Bougie Ratchet” but just because it’s embroidered on a pillow you shoved onto your boucle sofa doesn’t make you Megan Thee Stallion. You went to Duke and live in Murray Hill. Or is it the pillow itself letting us know it’s Classy Bougie and Ratchet, like a character in Beauty and the Beast? Either way, don’t let your home become a wine mom’s Facebook, cluttered with empty clichés that signal not free expression but desperation. Unless it’s a Tracey Emin piece, there should be no, like, neon sign that lets you know you’re in the kitchen. Will you forget that the room with the toaster is for cooking? Are you in nursery school?Do this Instead: Let the home speak for itself. Don’t take the shortcut to expression by borrowing a mass-produced sentiment. Be the “Classy Bougie Ratchet” you want to see in the world.

Abstract painting with layered brushstrokes in teal, navy, lavender, and cream.
Photography by Vojtech Bruzek/Unsplash.

Offense: Generic Abstract Expressionist Art

Why It’s Wrong: You’ve spent years painstakingly considering every piece of furniture, the wallpaper in every room, the exact incense scent in the guest bathroom, and yet when it comes to the art, you decide to hang some lifeless Marriott Bonvoy-ass abstract painting that looks like it was farted out by Cy Twombly’s corpse. This type of abstract art is meant to communicate your “refined good taste” but it lacks any of the muscularity and passion that you find in a De Kooning or a Krasner. Instead, this is what you’d see in the staging of a luxury penthouse whose foreign buyers are second guessing because they’re terrified of the Mamdani pied-à-terre tax. A painting so banal it makes Damien Hirst dot paintings look like a Kara Walker mural. It dangles delicately between the boundaries of figurative and abstract, committing to neither and numbing you in a swirl of decorative shapes. IT’S BORING!Do this Instead: Burn the “artwork,” and beg for forgiveness. Go to small, independent galleries, take a risk on a work that might offend somebody, might cause your guests to actually feel something instead of just melting into the surroundings like a Cheshire Cat.

Wooden bookshelf of vintage hardcover books arranged by color against floral wallpaper.
Photography by Bree Anne/Unsplash.

Offense: Books Arranged by Color

Why It’s Wrong: A rainbow bookshelf is not just an aesthetic crime, it is an assault on the very nature of civilization. Imagine somebody asks you where Essays One by Lydia Davis is, and you say “Oh, I think in the green section,” as if a book containing depth and beauty can be distilled into a paint sample. At least when the fascists burned books they had the decency to care about their contents. Treating a book as a decorative object, relegating its contents to the posterior of your Skittle-wall, tells your guests that you do not read, and when you do it’s probably a book about elves 69-ing on your kindle.Do this Instead: Over-obsess for the rest of your life about the arrangement of your mammoth library, organizing and reorganizing your books based on a baroque methodology only you understand. Should you place Zadie Smith’s essay collections alongside her fiction, or should they be in the dedicated contemporary literature section? Is there a dedicated short story section that separates Chekhov from his plays? These are the types of questions that should haunt you for the rest of your days and, honestly, are what make a life worth living.

 

More of our favorite stories from CULTURED

Long Before Nathan Fielder’s Brand of Post-Truth, There Was Janet Malcolm

How the Elite’s Cryopreservation Obsession Is Changing the Architecture of Death

11 Gallery Shows by Living Legends on View This Month in New York

What Does Hollywood’s Recent Obsession With Monster Sex Say About Our Desires?

Every Fall/Winter 2026 Fashion Collection, Collab, and Campaign You Need to Know

Sign up for our newsletter here to get these stories direct to your inbox.

Keke Palmer

You’ve reached your limit.

Sign up for a digital subscription, starting at as little as $3/week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complimentary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for starting at as little as $3/week.

Carey Mulligan

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Carey Mulligan

GET ACCESS. 

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Conner Storrie standing on a street
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Conner Storrie standing on a street

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Conner Storrie standing on a street
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Conner Storrie standing on a street

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complimentary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for starting at as little as $3/week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Conner Storrie standing on a street

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Conner Storrie standing on a street

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want a seat at the table? To continue reading this article, sign up today.

Support independent criticism for $10/month (or just $110/year).

Already a subscriber? Log in.